Binns v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
Demoris Binns appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of trafficking in cocaine. Binns claims the trial court erred in not granting a mistrial after his character was placed into evidence and also erred in not granting his motion to reveal the identity of the confidential informant who set up the drug deal. We find no error and affirm.
1. First, Binns contends his character was impermissibly placed into evidence when the prosecutor said in his opening statement that “[w]e expect the evidence in this case to show that DeMorris Binns, also known as Morris…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Bridges v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Racquemore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Goldsby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Golden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Bowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.