United States v. Rowland Chester Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to consider the dimensions of Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3), which excepts from the hearsay rule statements against penal interest made by a declarant whose testimony is unavailable at trial. The appellant, Thomas, was tried for bank robbery jointly with Weeks. At trial Thomas sought to place a U.S. Magistrate on the stand to testify that Weeks, at the close of the preliminary hearing for all those indicted in the robbery, made statements exculpating Thomas. The trial judge ruled the evidence inadmissible, and both Thomas and Weeks were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Arthur BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James MintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. William John BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by102 opinions
- United States v. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. William Anthony Johnson (04-5110/6161) and Christopher L. Stone (04-5146)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Gilberto Pablo AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Joseph EbronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Claude Leander RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.