Legal Opinion
State v. Spivey
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 8, 1999No. AC 18028PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of three counts of sale of a narcotic substance by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b) and three counts of sale of a controlled substance within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) admitted hearsay evidence, (2) instructed the jury on the state’s burden of proof and (3) admitted evidence of uncharged misconduct. We affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Martins v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. CepedaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Spivey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. SpiveySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999