Legal Opinion
Forbis v. Educators Automobile Insurance
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 22, 1965No. Civ. No. 63-81PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Plaintiff became the general agent for the State of Oklahoma for the defendant, a Texas insurance company, with principal office at Ft. Worth, Texas, pursuant to a General Agent’s Agreement dated May 16, 1960. Under this agreement, plaintiff was to secure and appoint local agents in Oklahoma subject to approval of the defendant; instruct, advise and assist such local agents and make regular periodic calls upon them; plaintiff was to receive from the defendant 5% in commissions on net premiums written by the local agents in Oklahoma and accepted by the company. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. Security Trust & Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Pellet v. Manufacturers' & Merchants' Ins. Co. of PittsburgCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Johnston & Harder, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Wheeler v. Hartford Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Foster v. Lincoln Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- Forbis v. Educators Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- William C. Forbis v. Educators Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966