Legal Opinion

Pushinsky v. West Virginia Board of Law Examiners

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1980No. 14706PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGraw, Justice:

Petitioner, Jon Pushinsky, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents, the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners, to process his application for admission to the West Virginia State Bar. We are asked to decide if the Board may decline to consider an application for admission to the practice of law when an applicant refuses to answer questions relating to his advocacy of or knowing affiliation with organizations advocating the violent or forceful overthrow of the government. We conclude that compelling applicants to answer the questions put forward here as a prerequisite…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. McGraw v. Imperial MarketingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. West Virginia Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. DaleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Major v. DeFrenchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Women's Health Center of West Virginia, Inc. v. PanepintoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API