Friedman v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Wenzel, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Beldock, J., concur insofar as the judgment in favor of defendant Rose Sabella against defendant city is reversed and a new trial granted, but dissent insofar as said judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant city is reversed and a new trial granted and vote to reverse said judgment insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff against defendant City of New York and to grant a new trial unless plaintiff, within twenty days from the *882entry of the order hereon, stipulate to reduce the verdict in his favor from $40,000 to $25,000, in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Price v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Nekris v. YellenNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maini v. HasslerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Grote v. Jonbert Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955