Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1994No. 92-2628PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtA. William Sweeney, J.

Upon a careful and thorough review of the record in this case, we are convinced that the number of errors during the guilt phase of defendant’s capital trial deprived him of his constitutional due process right to a fair trial. Therefore, for the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals upholding defendant’s convictions, and remand the cause to the court of common pleas for further proceedings.

I

In his first proposition of law, defendant contends that his prior conviction for second degree murder in Florida cannot be the basis for convicting him of an R.C.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. KeenanOhio Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Michael Jeffrey Johnson v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Masters v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. State v. EaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. O'NealOhio Supreme Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API