Speight v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
The appellant was convicted of distributing obscene materials in violation of Code Ann. § 26-2101. Held:
1. Enumerated error No. 1 is unsupported by argument or citation of authority and is therefore deemed abandoned. Cochran v. Baxter, 142 Ga. App. 546, 547 (236 SE2d 528).
2. Appellant’s constitutional attacks on Code Ann. § 26-2101 have been resolved adversely to him in Pierce v. State, 239 Ga. 844 (239 SE2d 28). Enumerated errors Nos. 2 and 4 are without merit.
3. Appellant objects to the warrantless seizure of, among other items, dildos and artificial vaginas. These devices…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pollard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Underwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Cochran v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mullins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- CABARET AFTER DARK, INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Terry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979