Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martinez v. Hoveling

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1969No. 37031Published

1DissentCarter, J.

This court holds that when a litigant has approved instructions in the trial court by word or act, he cannot thereafter effectively complain on review of the instructions given. With this statement, I am wholly in disagreement.

It has been a fundamental rule in the state that it is the duty and responsibility of the trial court to instruct the jury on the law as to all issues of fact supported by the pleadings and the evidence whether requested to do so or not. Pursuant to statute and the, rules of this court, no objection to an instruction when given need be made in the record to have it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beveridge v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF ROADSNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Derr v. GunnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API