Ciotoli v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and amended petition dismissed. Memorandum: The positive result of the EMIT test, which was confirmed with the result of a second EMIT test, constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.12 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [iii] [use of a controlled substance]) (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135, 138; Matter of Montalalou v Coombe, 242 AD2d 917, lv denied 91 NY2d 805). Petitioner contends that the specimen bottle was not properly labeled with his identification, in violation of 7 NYCRR…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- New York City Transit Authority v. New York State Department of LaborNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ortiz v. RourkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Comfort v. IrvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Green v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Paige v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Russell v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Coates v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Spears v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cookhorne v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.