Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Doucet v. Jantzen, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 2001No. 00-1318Published

1ConcurrenceI Woodard, J.

Footnoting court opinions — an odd topic to trigger a concurring opinion, particularly since it was not an issue which the parties or the opinion addressed. Notwithstanding, since Chief Judge Doucet has found it fit to place, what amounts to, his stylistic preference for legal opinion writing at issue in this public forum, fairness dictates that his comments be addressed in a similar fashion.

Specifically, rather than focusing on the merits of the opinion, Chief Judge Dou-cet’s sole reason for concurring lies in his objection to the use of citational footnotes in the instant opinion.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CrawfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Lamson Petroleum Co. v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Lamson Petroleum Co. v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. State v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Haynes v. Calcasieu Medical Transp., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API