Legal Opinion

Edward J. Gay Planting & Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1944No. 10965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner seeks a refund of processing taxes which were imposed and which it alleges it paid and did not pass on to consumers. The claim was. for $27,419.-30. The parties filed- a joint stipulation of facts. The Tax Court made its findings of facts on the basis of the stipulation and held that the taxpayer had failed to prove that it was entitled to a refund of any part of the amount involved. The proceeding is here for a review of the decision of the Tax Court.

The taxpayer was a grower and purchaser of sugar cane and was also a producer of direct consumption sugar.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bain Peanut Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  2. Commissioner v. Webre Steib Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Helvering v. Insular Sugar Refining Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Sugar Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API