Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided February 20, 2001No. 2575993PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENTS, Judge.

Weinthal Lockhart was tried by jury and convicted of forcible sodomy for having anally and orally sodomized a boy less than thirteen years of age, in violation of Code § 18.2-67.1. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred (1) in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his home that was invalid because the magistrate failed to file the affidavit supporting the search warrant within thirty days as required by Code § 19.2-54, (2) in not allowing the admission of evidence of the victim’s misconduct at school and of his tendency to always make excuses…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Sutphin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
  5. Quintana v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tynes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  2. Caison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  3. Donald Matthew Kelley v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
  4. Foster v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  5. Gagelonia v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API