Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Marie M. Newman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 17, 1957No. 15763_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Judge.

This matter is before us on petition of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to review a decision of the Tax Court of the United States. The Commissioner determined deficiencies in respondent’s income tax for the years 1946 through 1953, occurring by reason of her failure to include in her gross income for such years certain alimony payments received by her.

Respondent and Floyd R. Newman were married in Cleveland, Ohio, February 28,1934, and thereafter continuously resided together as husband and wife until on or about January, 1945, at which time Floyd R. Newman left…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Omaha Nat. Bank v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  3. Blum v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  4. F. E. Card and W. S. Adams v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Newman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  2. William M. Joslin, Sr. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  3. Midwest Motor Express, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  4. Joseph F. Kisting v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  5. Munderloh v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API