Legal Opinion

In the Interests of A.S.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 11, 2015No. Nos. 113,315; 113,316; 113,317PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schroeder, J.:

The State appeals the denial of its motion to terminate the parental rights of R.S. (natural father) and E.S. (natural mother) as to their three children. R.S. and E.S. object to the State s appeal, claiming this court does not have jurisdiction. In response, the State claims K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 38-2273(a) provides it with jurisdiction to appeal. We find K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 38-2273(a) is a specific statute governing the right to appeal and does not provide the State authority to appeal the denial of its motion to terminate parental rights. With this determination, we decline to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Frazier v. GoudschaalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Cady v. SchrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. SvatySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of T.S.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. In Re Interest of T.S.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API