Legal Opinion

Hauscheld v. Hauscheld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, George W. Hauscheld, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 8tli day of July, 1898, denying his motion to vacate an order, made after the entry of judgment in the action, granting the plaintiff alimony. ■ .

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J.:

On the 31st of July, 1885, a judgment was entered in this action by which the plaintiff was awarded an absolute divorce from the defendant. It contained, however, no direction requiring the payment of alimony to the plaintiff, but instead there was the following “It is further ordered and adjudged that the question of alimony and the amount to be paid, if any, by tile- defendant George W. Hauscheld for the support,, maintenance and education of said child, Reese C. Hauscheld, be reserved for the future consideration. of this .court.’’ No application was made to the court to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kamp v. . KampNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. People Ex Rel. Commissioners of Public Charities & Correction v. CullenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Forrest v. . ForrestNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  5. Walker v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fox v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Balbert v. BalbertNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Crawford v. CrawfordNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  4. LePage v. LePageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Livingston v. LivingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API