PMA Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
RODGERS, Senior Judge.
The PMA Group (PMA) petitions for review of the June 23, 2000 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the May 15, 1998 decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) substituting PMA as the responsible insurance carrier in this action. We affirm.
The following facts are summarized from the WCJ’s findings. On June 30, 1993, George Nickles (Claimant) was injured in the course of his employment as a roofer with Keystone Contractors, Inc. (Employer). Claimant cracked a bridge in his mouth and suffered injuries to. his hands, elbows and knees,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Birmingham Fire Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Barna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Swartz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Accurate Eng'g. Solutions, LLC v. J. Anderson & Williams Form Eng'g. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022