Juenger v. Bucyrus-Erie Company
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
JUERGENS, Chief Judge.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendant Bucyrus-Erie Company moves to dismiss Counts V, VII, IX and X, and defendant Walter Palmer moves to dismiss Count VIII of the complaint. Each motion is premised on failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Count V is based on the Structural Work Act of the State of Illinois, namely, Section 60-69, Chapter 48, Illinois Revised Statutes. This Act, commonly referred to as the “Scaffolding Act,” provides in pertinent parts as follows:
“All scaffolds, hoists, cranes, stays, ladders, supports, or other mechanical contrivances,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wright v. Massey-Harris, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Bullman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Bossert v. Wabash RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
3Cited by9 opinions
- Farley v. Marion Power Shovel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Warren v. MeekerIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Swendsen v. Brighton Building & Maintenance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- City of Chicago v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
- Acquaviva v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.