McEathron v. Township of Worth
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely
delivered the opinion of the court.
The principal question presented by this appeal is whether a township is, in the absence of statute, exempt from tort liability.
Plaintiff, a minor, brought suit to recover damages because of an attractive nuisance said to be maintained by defendants. The complaint alleged that in July 1936 the Township of Worth, one of the defendants, through its agents leased and controlled a certain lot in the township which was vacant and unfenced and adjacent to the streets; that it kept stored there various sorts of road machinery and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Roumbos v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- County of Cook v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- West Chicago Masonic Ass'n v. CohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Tarjan v. National Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hennigs v. Centreville TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- People ex rel. Town of New Trier v. HaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- County of Lake v. CuneoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
- Hennigs v. Centreville TownshipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Hennigs v. Centreville TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1974