Legal Opinion

A. Philip Randolph Inst. of OH v. Frank LaRose

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 9, 2020No. 20-4063Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 20a0580n.06 No. 20-4063 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Oct 09, 2020 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE OF OHIO, ) et al., ) Plaintiffs-Appellees, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR v. ) THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ) OHIO FRANK LAROSE, ) ) ORDER Defendant-Appellant. ) ) BEFORE: GRIFFIN, WHITE, and THAPAR, Circuit Judges. GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that lower federal courts should ordinarily not alter election rules on the eve of an election.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Purcell v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Norman v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API