Hertog v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
— At issue in this case is the propriety of a discovery order that denies access to treatment records and prohibits deposition testimony of treatment providers for Barry Krantz, a convicted sex offender. In the interest of judicial economy, we also address the propriety of the denial of summary judgment to the two municipalities *46that simultaneously exercised supervision over Krantz at the time he raped a six-year-old girl.1
Barry Krantz raped six-year-old S.H. Krantz was on probation with the City of Seattle following convictions for lewd offenses when he committed the rape. Sid Hoover was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Demelash v. Ross Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.