Legal Opinion

Hertog v. City of Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 22, 1997No. 37291-2-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

— At issue in this case is the propriety of a discovery order that denies access to treatment records and prohibits deposition testimony of treatment providers for Barry Krantz, a convicted sex offender. In the interest of judicial economy, we also address the propriety of the denial of summary judgment to the two municipalities *46that simultaneously exercised supervision over Krantz at the time he raped a six-year-old girl.1

Barry Krantz raped six-year-old S.H. Krantz was on probation with the City of Seattle following convictions for lewd offenses when he committed the rape. Sid Hoover was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Demelash v. Ross Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API