Legal Opinion
Ginsburg Et Ux. v. Arnold
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 21, 1950No. 13239_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
185 F.2d 913
51-1 USTC P 9108
GINSBURG et ux.
v.
ARNOLD et al.
No. 13239.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 21, 1950.
Frank B. Appleman, Benjamin L. Bird, and Richard Uk Simon, all of Fort Worth, Tex., for appellants.
Edward J. P. Zimmerman, Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frank B. Potter, U.S. Atty., Forth Worth, Tex., O. Morris Harrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Dallas, Tex;, for appellees.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
1
This is the second appeal of this case. In the first appeal it…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Eber B. Ward, Survivor, &C., Owner of the Steamboat Detroit v. Charles ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Catrino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Ginsburg Et Ux. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Ginsburg v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949