Legal Opinion

United States v. Three Gambling Devices, Known as Jokers, Sub-Assembly and Essential Part of a Gambling Device

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 1, 1958No. 12448PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment for the claimant in libels filed by the United States against certain alleged Gambling Devices. The claim is that the seized devices are gambling devices under 15 U.S.C.A. § 1171. It is agreed that the machines here are identical with those discussed by the Ninth Circuit in Hanni-fin v. United States, 1957, 248 F.2d 173. The Government having lost in that litigation is evidently endeavoring to create a conflict among the circuits by trying the same process elsewhere. We do not have anything to add to what the court said in the Hannifin case and in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Three (3) Gambling DevicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. 11 Star-Pack Cigarette Merchandiser MachinesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API