Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1936No. 25738PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “Although, under our statute and the general rule, ‘bank cheeks and promissory notes are not payment until themselves paid’ (Code, § 20-1004), they nevertheless constitute payment if the creditor has agreed to accept or has received them as such.” Nash Motors Co. v. Harrison Co., 52 Ga. App. 333, 335 (183 S. E. 202), and cit. Where, after the execution of a promissory note, a renewal or new note is executed for the same debt, it is the general rule that the second instrument does not of itself operate as a payment, or accord and satisfaction, or novation extinguishing the first note,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Georgia National Bank v. FryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Butts v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Kennedy v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Nash Motors Co. v. Harrison Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. MacNerland v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Feely v. First American BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Taylor v. Tulsa Tribune Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  4. Cohen's Department Stores Inc. v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Georgialina Enterprises, Inc. v. FrakesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API