Legal Opinion

Jones v. Whitsett

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court. — IIon. A. J. Seay, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, C.

This action was commenced on the 21st day of November, 1879, for breach of covenant of warranty in a deed of conveyance. Before the end of the trial, the plaintiff discontinued his claim for damages on the covenant as to all the land described in the petition, except forty acres. The case was tried by a jury and resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $131.50, from which the defendant appeals. The facts appearing in the evidence of this case would have been disclosed more satis*189factorily if tlie law governing tliem had been more definitely declared and applied…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dickson v. Desire's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  2. Chambers' Administrator v. Smith's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  3. Cockrell v. ProctorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Vancourt v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  5. Miller v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. KennedySupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Coleman v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Hunt v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Talbert v. GristMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Schnelle & Querl Lumber Co. v. BarlowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API