Legal Opinion
Smeed v. Stockmen's Loan Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1930No. Nos. 5265, 5266, 5267PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.
— Respondents Smeed, Hartman and Hartley instituted separate actions against appellant and others for the purpose of recovering different sums alleged to be due for the care and feeding of certain cattle. The cases were consolidated for trial and hearing in this court upon appeal by the Stockmen’s Loan Company from judgments in favor of respondents. They will be discussed separately hereinaftex*.
SMEED CASE.
To secure the payment of a sum certain, Lewis L. Young and wife, on January 30, 1924, executed and delivered to the Stockmen’s National Bank of Nampa a chattel mortgage, covering, among…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gould v. HillIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Howes v. NewcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Marnella v. FromanIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- R. Becker & Degen v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Vollmer Clearwater Co. v. Union Warehouse & Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duthweiler v. HansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Pacific Nat. Agricultural Credit Corporation v. HagermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936