Ingram v. State

We find no error as to appellant’s point I and we affirm appellant’s sentence. As to appellant’s point II, we do not consider his constitutional attack on Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, because appellant would have been found to be an habitual felony offender under the pre-amended statute as well. Wright v. State, 579 So.2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.