Legal Opinion

Pezhman v. Department of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered August 23, 2010, which denied plaintiffs motion to strike defendants’ answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to carry her burden of clearly demonstrating *544that defendants’ failure to comply with disclosure obligations was willful, contumacious or in bad faith (compare Palmenta v Columbia Univ., 266 AD2d 90, 91 [1999], with Rodriguez v United Bronx Parents, Inc., 70 AD3d 492 [2010]). Plaintiff also failed to file the affirmation of good faith required by 22 NYCRR 202.7 (see 148 Magnolia, LLC v Merrimack…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 148 Magnolia, LLC v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Palmenta v. Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Rodriguez v. United Bronx Parents, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ventura v. Ozone Park Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API