Legal Opinion
Barber v. Continental Oil Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 13, 1958No. 38033PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
On April 17, 1957, Edward H. Barber, petitioner herein, filed a claim for compensation against Continental Oil Company, respondent herein, and its insurance carrier, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, referred to herein as insurance carrier, and Orville Jantzen stating that on March 19, 1957, while in the employ of respondent, Continental Oil Company, or Orville Jant-zen, he sustained an accidental injury consisting of a compound fracture of both legs causing total disability; that the accident occurred when a car ran over the grease rack and struck him.
Respondent,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. KindtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Eason Oil Co. v. RunyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- LeFlore County Coal Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Myers Mining & Milling Co. v. TennantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coe v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- White v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Daniels v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Himes v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Keogan v. Holy Family HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1980