Legal Opinion
Andrade v. Brookwood Communities, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 18, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
“The defense afforded to employers by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law may also extend to suits brought against an entity which is found to be the alter ego of the corporation which employs the plaintiff’ (Cappella v Suresky at Hatfield Lane, LLC, 55 AD3d 522, 522-523 [2008]; see Samuel v Fourth Ave. Assoc., LLC, 75 AD3d 594, 594-595 [2010]; Hageman v B & G Bldg. Servs., LLC, 33 AD3d 860, 861 [2006]). Here, although the defendants submitted some evidence that several of the defendants and the plaintiffs employer were related entities, the evidence did not establish…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Samuel v. Fourth Avenue Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Cappella v. Suresky at Hatfield Lane, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Donatin v. Sea Crest Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Alvarez v. Jamnick Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hageman v. B & G Building Services, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Woodbourne Arboretum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Perla v. Daytree Custom Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- McDonald v. Winter Bros. Transfer Station Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Masse v. ParrellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Gonzalez v. Woodbourne Arboretum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.