Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1964No. 37249PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Shall the happy picture of tugboats and barges, log booms and rafts, and ships of the sea — towing and being towed in bustling harmony upon the broad waters of the mighty Columbia — suffer the discordant intrusion of the business and occupation tax? Appellants, skipper and tugboat company alike, say no; the tax commission says yes. We must decide.

Wilbur J. Smith, individually, and Longview Tugboat Company, a corporation, plaintiffs, operate tugboats and barges on the Columbia River and its tributaries. From findings of fact based on an agreed statement of facts, we observe that appellants…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. WILLSON AND OTHERS v. the Black Bird Creek Marsh CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1829

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. ALON USA, LP v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  3. State Ex Rel. Namer Investment Corp. v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. LEARY & OWENS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Alaska Freight Lines, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API