Smith v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Shall the happy picture of tugboats and barges, log booms and rafts, and ships of the sea — towing and being towed in bustling harmony upon the broad waters of the mighty Columbia — suffer the discordant intrusion of the business and occupation tax? Appellants, skipper and tugboat company alike, say no; the tax commission says yes. We must decide.
Wilbur J. Smith, individually, and Longview Tugboat Company, a corporation, plaintiffs, operate tugboats and barges on the Columbia River and its tributaries. From findings of fact based on an agreed statement of facts, we observe that appellants…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- WILLSON AND OTHERS v. the Black Bird Creek Marsh CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1829
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- ALON USA, LP v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- State Ex Rel. Namer Investment Corp. v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. LEARY & OWENS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Alaska Freight Lines, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.