Legal Opinion

Ogden v. Libby

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 3, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, C. J.

This is an action by the plaintiff, a customer in defendants’ hardware store, to recover for injuries sustained in falling through an opening in the floor. The case is before us, after a jury verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, on appeal from denial of defendants’ motion for entry of judgment n.o.v., or in the alternative for a new trial. Under the familiar rules the verdict stands unless manifestly wrong and we take the evidence in the light most favorable to the successful party. Neal et al. v. Linnell, 156 Me. 1, 157 A. (2nd) 231; Fossett et al. v. Durant, 150 Me. 413, 113 A. (2nd) 620.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grogan v. O'Keeffe's Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Shaw v. PielSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
  3. Fossett v. DurantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  4. Neal v. LinnellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  5. Temple v. Congress Square Garage, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cyr v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Cuthbertson v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. State v. GellersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  4. Quinn v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. Seiders v. TestaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API