Reese v. Kassab
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1ConcurrenceRosenberg, District Judge
The petitioner in the instant case alleges that the suspension of his operator’s license prior to an opportunity to demonstrate that the Secretary’s records are in error, constitutes a violation of his rights to due process, guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.
“The fundamental requisite of due process of law is the opportunity to be heard.” Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385, 394, 34 S.Ct. 779, 783, 58 L.Ed. 1363 (1914). See also, Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 85 S.Ct. 1187, 14 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965); the concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Frankfurter in Joint Anti-Fascist Refuge Committee v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.