Legal Opinion

Supervision Co. v. Mogelewsky

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 6, 1931Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoeder, J.

Plaintiff brought an action against the defendants for electric current furnished by it to the defendants from March 1, 1930, to July 10, 1930. After due trial, the complaint was dismissed on the merits against the defendant Mogelewsky, and the defendants Katz and Auerbach were allowed to plead ultra vires. The trial court finds the facts in favor of the plaintiff, and the only question is whether the plea of ultra vires can prevail.

A contract was entered into between the plaintiff, a business corporation, and the defendants Katz and Auerbach, about twelve years prior to the commencement of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Bath Gas Light Co. v. . ClaffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Booth Bros. v. BairdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API