Legal Opinion

Olson v. County of Roseau

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1925No. 24,801PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appeal from an order denying a motion for amended conclusions of law or a new trial.

The appeal must be determined solely upon the pleadings and the findings. There is no settled case or bill of exceptions. The only ground for reversal then is that the findings of fact do not support the conclusions of law. The main facts found are these:

In 1912, County Ditch No. 11 in Roseau county was established. It had branches and laterals to lead the water into the branches. The ditch was constructed according to the plans and specifications of the engineer. After the construction it was ascertained that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lupkes v. Town of CliftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Garrett v. SkorstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. County of KandiyohiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Fischer v. Town of AlbinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Nostdal v. County of WatonwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. Felepe v. Towns of America and CedarbendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Simonson v. Township of AldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API