Legal Opinion

Rothenberg v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1964No. 63-118PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, Judge.

This appeal arose out of a mortgage foreclosure suit. It represented a contest between defendants who were bidders at the foreclosure sale. Farmers Home Administration, an agency of the United States, was declared the highest and best bidder. The appellants, who claimed the right to prevail as the highest bidder objected to the master’s report of sale. They appealed from an adverse order confirming sale.

After this court had considered the appeal and filed its opinion and judgment, but prior to expiration of the time for filing petition for rehearing and before our mandate had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Texas Consol. Theatres, Inc. v. PittmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spence v. Baldwin County Sav. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Ex Parte HopperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Florence Surgery Center, L.P. v. Eye Surgery Center of Florence, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  4. Dr. Erwin D. Jackson v. Leon County Elections Canvassing BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. Jackson v. Leon County Elections Canvassing BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API