People v. Nelson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*763The defendant’s contention that the People failed to prove that he inflicted physical injury during the robbery (see Penal Law § 160.10 [2]) is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant inflicted “physical injury” within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9). Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. ChiddickNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. MonserrateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. PringleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. MaierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. KennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.