Legal Opinion

State v. House

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 25, 1991No. 2 CA-CR 90-0701PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellee pled guilty to molestation of a child, a class 2 felony. At the sentencing hearing on June 20, 1990, it appeared that the trial court did not have before it a psychologist’s report referred to in the presentence report. Defense counsel suggested that sentencing should be continued but the court nevertheless went on with the hearing and sentenced appellee to a presumptive term of 17 years’ imprisonment. Appellee filed a motion to modify the sentence under Rule 24.3, Ariz.R.Crim.P., 17 A.R.S., based on the fact that the trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PattonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. FalknerArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. SunigaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. State v. GrierArizona Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HargraveArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. PROVENZINOCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. State of Arizona v. Jerry Don BryantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. State v. NealCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API