Legal Opinion

In re K.E.O.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 2017Published

1Opinion of the Court

*524OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert J. Muller, J.

Petitioner K.E.O., who is the mother of O.J.S. (XX/XX/2012) (hereinafter the infant), seeks to change the name of the infant to O.J.O. Petitioner contends that the interests of the infant will be substantially promoted by this name change. Specifically, petitioner states as follows:

“I have primary custody of [the infant], and support her fully on my own. Her father does not see her, ever, for his . . . scheduled visitations, [n]or is he paying child supprt [sic] for her. [The infant] will be starting school and I would like her to have the same name as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re EberhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re AltheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Learn v. HaskellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API