Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
The evidence in this appeal is not sufficient to enable the Board to determine the value of the patents for invested capital and depreciation purposes.
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal of CHEATHAM ELECTRIC SWITCHING DEVICE CO.
Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 528.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1 B.T.A. 984; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2730;
April 8, 1925, decided Submitted January 28, 1925.
The evidence in this appeal is not sufficient to enable the Board to determine the value of the patents for invested capital and depreciation purposes.
Elwood Hamilton, Esq., for the taxpayer.
A Calder Mackay, Esq., for the Commissioner.
LITTLETON
Before GRAUPNER, LANSDON, LITTLETON, and SMITH.
This appeal involves a deficiency in income tax for the years 1919 and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Transit Development Co. v. Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
- Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Brooklyn Rapid Transit Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1915