Rivera v. Revzin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on their cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1). The court found that defendant, who rented rooms in her single-family home to unrelated persons, made a business use of the premises and thus did not fall within the exception set forth in the statute for "owners of one and two-family dwellings who contract for *897but do not direct or control the work” (Labor Law § 240 [1]). We disagree with the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hook v. QuattrociocchiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Sanchez v. MarticorenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hosler v. Northern Eagle Beverages, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Amerogen v. DonniniNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rivera v. RevzinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.