Legal Opinion

Rivera v. Revzin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1990No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on their cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1). The court found that defendant, who rented rooms in her single-family home to unrelated persons, made a business use of the premises and thus did not fall within the exception set forth in the statute for "owners of one and two-family dwellings who contract for *897but do not direct or control the work” (Labor Law § 240 [1]). We disagree with the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hook v. QuattrociocchiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Sanchez v. MarticorenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Hosler v. Northern Eagle Beverages, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Amerogen v. DonniniNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Rivera v. RevzinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API