Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 2016No. ED 102777Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Alfred T. Anderson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and, conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k), Hymes v. State, 466 S.W.3d 677, 679 (Mo. App. E.D. 2015). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bruce A. Hymes, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API