Legal Opinion

In re Surety Bond for Costs

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1997No. Docket No. 182793PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants and third-party plaintiffs Oakland Disposal, Inc.; Bestway Recycling, Inc.; Aaro Disposal, Inc.; and Oakland Disposal No. 1 (hereinafter collectively referred to as third-party plaintiffs) appeal as of right from an order dismissing their complaint for failure to file a security bond. We affirm.

This case arises from litigation surrounding the Waterford Hills Sanitary Landfill (whsl). The landfill allegedly leaked hazardous substances, and the Attorney General brought a suit seeking damages and injunctive relief relating to cleanup at the site. Third-party plaintiff Oakland Disposal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaffier v. St. Johns HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Hall v. Harmony Hills Recreation, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Farleigh v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1251Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Oakland Disposal, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Armin Phillips v. Roger PommierMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Laurel Neff v. Chapel Hill Condominium AssociationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API