Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Brundage v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 29, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-0119Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL BRUNDAGE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25 - 119 (SLS) Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Paul Brundage alleges that he suffered a blood clotting disorder as a result of receiving a vaccine for COVID–19. He wants to seek compensation for this injury under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), a federal program established to compensate individuals injured by vaccines. But to seek compensation for an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API