Legal Opinion
Federoff v. Geisinger Clinic
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 23, 2021No. 4:21-cv-01903Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THEODORE FEDEROFF, et al., No. 4:21-CV-01903 Plaintiffs, (Chief Judge Brann) v. GEISINGER CLINIC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION NOVEMBER 23, 2021 Federal courts have tremendous power, but limited jurisdiction. Federal judges are not entitled to intervene any time that parties believe they have been treated unfairly. We wear robes, not crowns. Our role is transcribed. For federal judges to provide relief, parties must first show that they have an enforceable right. And if there’s no right, there can be no…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wallace v. JaffreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Colleen Reilly v. City of HarrisburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.