Legal Opinion

Horodeckyi v. Horodniak

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur Markewich, J.

Motions for temporary injunction are consolidated for disposition and are granted to the extent hereinafter set forth, while cross motions to dismiss, etc., on various grounds are denied. The application to refer this matter to the Justice who gave pro forma approval at Special Term, Part II, to the application for permission to sell is denied; this proceeding on notice and argument is in no sense a review of his action.

This disposition turns upon the admitted disregard by defendants of section 194 and 196 of the Beligious Corporations Law. Despite the by-laws, and the action taken by the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reid v. GholsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  2. Holy Cross Polish National Catholic Church v. MilazzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Matter of Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Assn.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Matter of Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Assn.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Reid v. GholsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API