Green v. City of Birmingham
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
THOMAS, Justice.
The view we entertain and announced in the original opinion (and from which we do not recede) renders unnecessary the consideration of the required notice to be given to subject the municipality to spit. That question is not considered though urged by counsel.
Appellant’s counsel say that “the record on this appeal shows the appeal is prosecuted, not only against the City of Birmingham, but also, against the two defendants, Coggins and Montgomery,
Assignments of error are that “The trial court erred in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trialthat the verdict of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Woodward Iron Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.