Guerra v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1DissentDorsey, Justice
I respectfully dissent.
Tex.R.App.P. 2(b) states in pertinent part:
Suspension of Rules in Criminal Matters Except as otherwise provided in these rules, in the cause shown, a court of *832appeals or the Court of Criminal Appeals may suspend requirements and provisions of any rule in a particular case on application of a party or on its own motion and may order proceedings in accordance with its direction.
In finding that appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a statement of facts should be denied, the majority chooses to ignore the authority granted it by the foregoing rule. The rationale…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- De La Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988