Legal Opinion · Dissent

Guerra v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 19, 1989No. 13-88-358-CRPublished

1DissentDorsey, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

Tex.R.App.P. 2(b) states in pertinent part:

Suspension of Rules in Criminal Matters Except as otherwise provided in these rules, in the cause shown, a court of *832appeals or the Court of Criminal Appeals may suspend requirements and provisions of any rule in a particular case on application of a party or on its own motion and may order proceedings in accordance with its direction.

In finding that appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a statement of facts should be denied, the majority chooses to ignore the authority granted it by the foregoing rule. The rationale…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  5. De La Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API