Legal Opinion
Tanaka v. First Hawaiian Bank
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 11, 2000No. Civ. 96-00734SPKPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL P. KING, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is a factually and legally complicated case. The motions before the Court involve tricky and evolving concepts regarding, among other things, accrual of federal civil RICO claims. Defendant Roy Kodani, joined by Defendant First Hawaiian Bank, filed (1) a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (on the RICO Count of the First Amended Complaint) and (2) a Motion for Summary Judgment against Fourth-Party Plaintiff Micki Ikuko Date (on Date’s malpractice Count). After the matters were argued, two sets of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marceau v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1269District Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Hancock v. Kulana Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
- Creative Power Solutions v. Energy Services GroupDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Puana v. KealohaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.