Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Williams

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided May 6, 2010No. 14-09-00353-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceLeslie B. Yates, Justice

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court properly granted Williams’s motion to suppress. I write separately to provide a different analysis for the ultimate conclusion that the trial court was correct.

Because Officer Duncan searched Williams without a warrant, it was the State’s burden to prove that the search was reasonable under the circumstances. See Ford v. State, 158 S.W.3d 488, 492 (Tex.Crim.App.2005). When, as here, an officer has a reasonable suspicion that a suspect may be armed and dangerous, he is entitled to conduct a limited search for weapons to ensure the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API